in the Lower San Antonio of Oakland
Home
Who We Are - Partners
Our Work
Committees and Work Groups
Joint Committee
Family Economic Success
º Asset Development
º Financial Services
º Workforce Development
Early Childhood Education
Resident Engagement
º Community Outreach
º Newspaper
º Neigborhood Grants
º Implementation Planning
Archive

Key Documents

MCO Forms
Neighborhood Map
InfoOakland datahouse
Contact
Liz Johnson
Urban Strategies Council
672 Thirteenth St.
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 463-2883
Fax (510) 893-6657
Send an e-mail
Annie E. Casey:
Making Connections
AECF 2005 CCI Calendar
Urban Strategies Council

Planning Committee

Meeting Notes
June 14, 2001, 12-2pm
Hismen Hin-Nu

Working Group Reports

  • Fred
    • OSV TA
    • Introduce city officials to other cities where there have been successful planning process (Washington, DC and Rochester, NY).
    • Thank people for Bart and Pat tour
    • Fred trying to get perspective on the collaborative from CBOs, he will also be talking to city and county officials.
    • Themes:
      • Role of collaborative: this role still needs definition, more structure and accountability, good vehicle for information exchange.
      • Issues and concerns regarding: relationship between collaborative and Casey
      • Connection to broader community – How to connect to broader San Antonio constituency.
    • Would like to get into more detail at the next meeting.
  • Housing and Economic Development
  • Law Firm
    • Focus on school district since they will be thinking properly
    • Eminent Domaintake private property for public use
    • Required to pay for private property, just compensation
    • Lots of opportunity to comment before they get to eminent domain
    • CEQA processenvironmental review
      • Can call school district and get on list to receive notices
      • Publish articles
      • Post notices

Notices and eminent domain

Notice of decision and appraisal

  • How property is appraised to give just compensation
  • Will probably hire a consulting firm to do appraising
  • May not want to see propertywill determine value based on comparable sales
  • It is better for them to walk through to show them feature of property that add value
  • District will make an offer
  • Given time frame to accept or reject offer is 2-3 weeks
  • District is required to give just compensation
  • Unique process for business ownersmust be “good will”
    • There are qualities of a business that make it more valuable.

Notice of intent to displace

  • Not required by law, but recommended
  • Notice to people who will be displaced
  • Notice that they will talk about relocation

Citizen Participation in Displacement Process

  • Relocation Committee
  • Offer input to district on relocation assistance
  • Could work with district earlyget them to send out notice of intent to displace

Notice of Hearing

  • After they receive an offer on property
  • 15 days to prepare for hearing
  • How to contact district will appear at hearing
  • Formalityfor district to make public a set of findings
  • Opportunities to make views public
  • Resolution of Necessity
  • Next step to file suit

Order of Posession

  • District can take property before resolution of suit
  • District can put escrow in court
  • Court can grant order of possession
  • No less than 90 days to vacate property
  • Can petition court for hardship circumstances

Relocation Assistance/ Separate from EO

  • School district has to help you find a new home/property
  • Required to communicate regularly so people understand process
  • Citizen participation is key
  • Relocation committee can review relocation plan
  • Minimum of 30 days review period for relocation
  • Sooner the committee is formed the better
  • 60 days after just compensation value, required to:
    • provide written materials on relocation notice
    • needs to be in language that people can understand
    • send someone for personal interview
      • income, size of family, age, location of work, area where you prefer to be relocated, own, rent, needs for social and public service, children require special services, amenities.
  • School district needs to understand individual needs
  • Conduct a survey of available housing and business locationshave to make info available.
  • Public Housing
    • Units available
    • Binding commitment from government entity to assist.
    • Work with agency often and early

Comparable Replacement Housing

  • Everyone displaced must be relocated, but can move people to temporary housing. This housing must be similar (size, #of rooms, quality of construction. Housing has to be in financial means

Last Resort Housing

  • Can build housing, but unusual funds needs to be available, worth bringing up, but can kill a project.
  • City has it’s own requirements
  • Financial assistance
    • Have to help people move
      • Transportation, packaging, etc.
      • Can provide money upfront as oppose to reimbursement
      • Special funds for licensing, etc.
  • Replacement Housing Payments
    • If not able to find comparable housing, district can give replacement housing
    • Short term subsidy, 42 month stretch.

Discussion

  • There is no comparable housing in Oakland.
  • Can push hard to get people comparable housing, but this can stall the project
  • School district has to provide habitable housing
  • Survey start in concentric circles ( Neighborhood, Oakland, Alameda County)
  • Third Party Relocation groups
  • Financial Assistance for homeowners that want to purchase new homes.
  • Relocation committee laws are not clear
  • 9-13 groups relocated (argument that district needs housing plan)

Next Steps

  • OCO: Need to develop relationship with the City. Make sure the city and school board work together. Dialogue an the City level
  • Establish core recommendations to OUSDWill respond to committee if they take leadership. Equal partnership between OUSD and City.
  • EBALDC: Take a look at General Plan/ Consolidated Plan see if the city is compliance
  • Urban Strategies Council: Look at cities that have been through a similar process (LA, SF)
  • Core Recommendations
  • Technical Aspects
    • Land banking
    • Other responses
      • Start with churches: bring people in get on Sunday agenda
      • Try to form relocation committee raised at OUSD meeting
      • Information and Referral USC/Collaborative
      • Talk to school board members-
    • Individual meetings of school board impacted people, and collaborative members.
  • Newspaper
    • 1st Issue in production
    • Next issues will be done through work shops
    • Flyers announcing the work shops
    • Need to distribute throughout the neighborhood.
  • Education
  • Arts and Culture
  • 23rd Ave. Corridor Action Team

Schedule for Working Group Meetings

Collaborative Meeting Structure

City Services in the Lower San Antonio

  • Andrea Youngdahl, Director, Dept. of Aging, Health, and Human Services
  • Catherine Firpo, CEDA Housing Specialist
  • Theresa Navarro, CEDA Commercial Revitalization
  • Clark Gertner, CEDA Code Enforcement
  • David Granados, Public Works Agency
  • Russella Hale, Police Services Agency
  • Libby Schaaf, City Council Aide to Ignacio De la Fuente
  • Paul Tran, City Council Aide to Danny Wan
  • Peter Clayton, Fire Department